|
|
@@ -3233,6 +3233,43 @@ for more information.
|
|
|
</note>
|
|
|
</mark-expected-failures>
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ <mark-expected-failures>
|
|
|
+ <test name="test_array"/>
|
|
|
+ <test name="std_test_array"/>
|
|
|
+ <test name="test_complex"/>
|
|
|
+ <test name="std_test_complex"/>
|
|
|
+ <test name="test_function"/>
|
|
|
+ <test name="std_test_function"/>
|
|
|
+ <test name="test_mem_fn"/>
|
|
|
+ <test name="std_test_mem_fn"/>
|
|
|
+ <test name="test_random"/>
|
|
|
+ <test name="std_test_random"/>
|
|
|
+ <test name="test_regex"/>
|
|
|
+ <test name="std_test_regex"/>
|
|
|
+ <test name="test_result_of"/>
|
|
|
+ <test name="std_test_result_of"/>
|
|
|
+ <test name="test_shared_ptr"/>
|
|
|
+ <test name="std_test_shared_ptr"/>
|
|
|
+ <test name="test_tr1_include"/>
|
|
|
+ <test name="std_test_tr1_include"/>
|
|
|
+ <test name="test_tuple"/>
|
|
|
+ <test name="std_test_tuple"/>
|
|
|
+ <test name="test_type_traits"/>
|
|
|
+ <test name="std_test_type_traits"/>
|
|
|
+ <test name="run_complex_overloads"/>
|
|
|
+ <test name="std_run_complex_overloads"/>
|
|
|
+ <test name="run_random"/>
|
|
|
+ <test name="std_run_random"/>
|
|
|
+ <toolset name="borland*"/>
|
|
|
+ <note author="John Maddock">
|
|
|
+ Support for Borland C++ in the various TR1 libraries is pretty
|
|
|
+ poor (due to numerous compiler bugs sadly). The TR1 concept
|
|
|
+ checks are *very* strict, and are expected to fail with this
|
|
|
+ compiler. More conservative uses are more likely to succeed
|
|
|
+ with this compiler however.
|
|
|
+ </note>
|
|
|
+ </mark-expected-failures>
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
<mark-expected-failures>
|
|
|
<test name="std_test_bind"/>
|
|
|
<test name="test_bind"/>
|
John Maddock