Răsfoiți Sursa

Second attempt to mark value_init_test failure of Intel 9.0. First attempt, changeset [54560], did not "mark up" as "expected failure" at www.boost.org/development/tests/trunk/developer/utility_.html

[SVN r54611]
Niels Dekker 17 ani în urmă
părinte
comite
4b9520712b
1 a modificat fișierele cu 2 adăugiri și 1 ștergeri
  1. 2 1
      status/explicit-failures-markup.xml

+ 2 - 1
status/explicit-failures-markup.xml

@@ -5747,7 +5747,8 @@ With aC++, the tests compile cleanly in strict ansi mode and succeed.
         </test>
         </test>
         <test name="value_init_test">
         <test name="value_init_test">
           <mark-failure>
           <mark-failure>
-            <toolset name="intel-9.0"/>
+            <toolset name="intel-9.0*"/>
+            <toolset name="intel-linux-9.0*"/>
             <note author="Niels Dekker" date="2009-07-01">
             <note author="Niels Dekker" date="2009-07-01">
             When I made the conversion from value_initialized&lt;T&gt; to T&amp;
             When I made the conversion from value_initialized&lt;T&gt; to T&amp;
             const-correct, this specific compiler version gave compile errors.
             const-correct, this specific compiler version gave compile errors.

粤ICP备19079148号