refer to "Library Submission Process" instead of explaining outdated procedures

[SVN r8860]

more/faq.htm

@@ -23,11 +23,8 @@
 
 <h1>Frequently Asked Questions</h1>
 
-<p><b>How is a library accepted for posting on the site?</b> An initial review by the
-library master filters out libraries which do not meet the absolute requirements (must be
-C++, ownership clear, reasonable format, etc.)&nbsp; The author is free to rework and
-resubmit libraries which do not pass initial muster. This is encouraged, particularly when
-reviewers like the idea behind a library but feel that details are lacking.</p>
+<p><b>How is a library accepted for posting on the site?</b>
+See <a href="submission_process.htm">Library Submission Process</a></p>
 
 <p><b>Is there any assurance libraries actually work as claimed?</b> No. The review
 process will hopefully eliminate the most seriously flawed libraries, but a well